Most business owners get a valuation because they want to know something. Sometimes they need to prove it. Those are two different engagements, and the difference matters the moment someone else has a reason to disagree with your number.
If you are settling an estate, working through a divorce, buying out a partner, or transferring ownership to a family member or a key employee, there is a party on the other side of that transaction. The IRS. A judge. Opposing counsel. Another owner. Each of them has an incentive to argue that the number is wrong.
A Conclusion of Value is the engagement built for that situation.
A Conclusion of Value is a full valuation engagement. The valuation analyst considers all relevant approaches to value, applies professional judgment to the ones that fit the business, and issues a single written opinion of what the company is worth.
Three things define it:
That written record is the point. When someone challenges the number, the report is what answers them.
A Conclusion of Value is the standard when the number will be reviewed by someone outside the room:
The common thread: someone else gets a vote on whether your number is right.
Not every valuation question requires this level of work. If you are testing a scenario, doing early exit planning, or want a directional sense of where the business stands, a Calculation of Value covers that ground faster and at lower cost. Scope and methods are agreed in advance, and the deliverable is a calculated value rather than an opinion.
The tradeoff is that a Calculation of Value is not built to withstand challenge. It is the right tool for planning and the wrong tool for court.
The question is not which engagement is better. It is who is going to read the result.
Before you commission a valuation, ask one question: where does this number end up?
If the answer is your own planning file, you have options. If the answer is a tax return, a settlement agreement, a purchase agreement, or a courtroom, you need a Conclusion of Value.
Getting this wrong is expensive in a specific way. A limited scope valuation that gets challenged does not just fail, it forces you to pay for a second engagement under time pressure, often after the other side has already framed the argument.
Tom Saris, CPA, CVA, CFE, walks through the Conclusion of Value engagement in the first episode of our Know Your Number valuation video series.
Tom is a Certified Valuation Analyst and Certified Fraud Examiner at Brinker Simpson & Company. He works with owners on estate and gift valuations, shareholder disputes, buy-sell transactions, and litigation support.
If you are not sure which type of valuation your situation calls for, that conversation is worth having before the engagement starts. Contact us to talk it through.